<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (10) TMI 95 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44370</link>
    <description>Crushing raw animal bones into bone meal was treated as manufacture on the facts found by the Tribunal, and that factual finding was left undisturbed. The resulting bone meal was therefore liable to excise duty under the residuary tariff entry. The exemption notification issue had been remanded to the Assistant Collector and was not under challenge, so it did not affect the present determination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 18:00:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82899" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (10) TMI 95 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44370</link>
      <description>Crushing raw animal bones into bone meal was treated as manufacture on the facts found by the Tribunal, and that factual finding was left undisturbed. The resulting bone meal was therefore liable to excise duty under the residuary tariff entry. The exemption notification issue had been remanded to the Assistant Collector and was not under challenge, so it did not affect the present determination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44370</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>