<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (8) TMI 113 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44363</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the order refusing the refund claim for taxes paid under State Excise Acts. The Court directed the respondent-State to refund the amount of Rs. 91,723.80 with interest to the appellants and awarded costs to the appellants. The judgment emphasized the importance of State Governments complying with legal decisions promptly, particularly in matters of tax refunds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2015 18:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82892" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (8) TMI 113 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44363</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the order refusing the refund claim for taxes paid under State Excise Acts. The Court directed the respondent-State to refund the amount of Rs. 91,723.80 with interest to the appellants and awarded costs to the appellants. The judgment emphasized the importance of State Governments complying with legal decisions promptly, particularly in matters of tax refunds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44363</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>