<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Refund of ITC: Statutory Right or Legislative Concession?</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=14643</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court has held that refund of unutilised ITC is a statutory concession confined to the specific situations set out in the refund proviso to Section 54(3), not a constitutional right, and that the proviso functions as a restriction on refunds. A High Court has recently permitted refunds where no express prohibition exists, creating an unresolved judicial divergence between permissive and restrictive approaches to refund entitlement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2025 08:44:36 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2025 08:44:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=828870" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Refund of ITC: Statutory Right or Legislative Concession?</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=14643</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court has held that refund of unutilised ITC is a statutory concession confined to the specific situations set out in the refund proviso to Section 54(3), not a constitutional right, and that the proviso functions as a restriction on refunds. A High Court has recently permitted refunds where no express prohibition exists, creating an unresolved judicial divergence between permissive and restrictive approaches to refund entitlement.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Goods and Services Tax - GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2025 08:44:36 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=14643</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>