https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44357 The writ court found that the Tribunal's pre-deposit and interim protection order had not properly addressed material grounds raised in the stay and waiver application, including the legality of the confiscation order, the quantum of fine, the petitioner's sick industrial status, protection under Section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985, and the limitation objection. Because those pleaded issues went to the merits of the request for relief, the Tribunal was expected to examine the application afresh and decide each point on its merits. Fresh consideration of the stay and waiver plea was therefore directed within the time fixed by the Court. en-us Mon, 15 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 25 Jun 2010 17:00:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44357 The writ court found that the Tribunal's pre-deposit and interim protection order had not properly addressed material grounds raised in the stay and waiver application, including the legality of the confiscation order, the quantum of fine, the petitioner's sick industrial status, protection under Section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985, and the limitation objection. Because those pleaded issues went to the merits of the request for relief, the Tribunal was expected to examine the application afresh and decide each point on its merits. Fresh consideration of the stay and waiver plea was therefore directed within the time fixed by the Court. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 15 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44357