https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44356 In a non-adjudicatory supervisory direction, the HC required the appellate authority to dispose of the pending waiver and stay application under Section 35F expeditiously where no order had been passed despite the appeal and authorities were insisting on deposit. The Court held that, if the application remained undecided, it must be decided within 15 days from production of a certified copy of the order. The direction was limited to securing prompt adjudication and did not determine the merits of the waiver or stay request. en-us Wed, 17 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 25 Jun 2010 16:58:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44356 In a non-adjudicatory supervisory direction, the HC required the appellate authority to dispose of the pending waiver and stay application under Section 35F expeditiously where no order had been passed despite the appeal and authorities were insisting on deposit. The Court held that, if the application remained undecided, it must be decided within 15 days from production of a certified copy of the order. The direction was limited to securing prompt adjudication and did not determine the merits of the waiver or stay request. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 17 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44356