https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772723 Amendment of a complaint to implead a company and its directors in a pending Negotiable Instruments Act prosecution was impermissible after process had been issued where prior statutory notice to the proposed accused was not shown and the complaint lacked specific averments that they were in charge of and responsible for the company's business at the relevant time. The cited precedent was held inapplicable on different facts, so the request to add the proposed accused was rejected and the challenge to refusal of amendment failed. en-us Tue, 04 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Jun 2025 08:41:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772723 Amendment of a complaint to implead a company and its directors in a pending Negotiable Instruments Act prosecution was impermissible after process had been issued where prior statutory notice to the proposed accused was not shown and the complaint lacked specific averments that they were in charge of and responsible for the company's business at the relevant time. The cited precedent was held inapplicable on different facts, so the request to add the proposed accused was rejected and the challenge to refusal of amendment failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 04 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772723