https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772727 In this excise duty case, the Tribunal partially allowed the appellant's appeal. The court set aside the Department's demand for Rs. 6,01,051/- and quashed the imposed penalty. The key findings were that the appellant voluntarily paid differential duty with interest before the show-cause notice, and the Department failed to justify the additional amount demanded. The Tribunal emphasized that good faith payment and lack of departmental evidence warranted relief from penalty and disputed duty demands. en-us Wed, 02 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Jun 2025 08:41:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772727 In this excise duty case, the Tribunal partially allowed the appellant's appeal. The court set aside the Department's demand for Rs. 6,01,051/- and quashed the imposed penalty. The key findings were that the appellant voluntarily paid differential duty with interest before the show-cause notice, and the Department failed to justify the additional amount demanded. The Tribunal emphasized that good faith payment and lack of departmental evidence warranted relief from penalty and disputed duty demands. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 02 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772727