https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772732 The revenue's appeal on de-bonding and duty on stock lying on the date of the final exit order was rejected because no substantial question of law arose for interference under section 35G of the Central Excise Act. The Tribunal had followed an earlier decision involving the same assessee on the same de-bonding issue, and the connected appeal had already been dismissed as infructuous. As the earlier orders had attained finality and no surviving legal question was shown, the Tribunal's order allowing the assessee's claim was left undisturbed. en-us Wed, 13 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Jun 2025 08:41:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772732 The revenue's appeal on de-bonding and duty on stock lying on the date of the final exit order was rejected because no substantial question of law arose for interference under section 35G of the Central Excise Act. The Tribunal had followed an earlier decision involving the same assessee on the same de-bonding issue, and the connected appeal had already been dismissed as infructuous. As the earlier orders had attained finality and no surviving legal question was shown, the Tribunal's order allowing the assessee's claim was left undisturbed. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 13 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772732