<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 848 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772735</link>
    <description>SC dismissed excise appeal due to 440-day delay in filing, finding no satisfactory explanation from appellant. The court also found no merit to interfere with the original tribunal order. The appeal was rejected both on procedural grounds of delay and substantive merits, with all pending applications disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2025 08:41:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=828815" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 848 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772735</link>
      <description>SC dismissed excise appeal due to 440-day delay in filing, finding no satisfactory explanation from appellant. The court also found no merit to interfere with the original tribunal order. The appeal was rejected both on procedural grounds of delay and substantive merits, with all pending applications disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772735</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>