<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (10) TMI 85 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44352</link>
    <description>Paper printed with colour by the rotogravure process using a PVC compound was treated as covered by the exemption entry in Notification No. 68 of 1976. The SC accepted that rotogravure colour printing is a recognised form of printing and held that paper subjected to such printing fell within the notification covering converted types of paper obtained by one side being printed with colour, with or without design, and whether or not later varnished, glazed or embossed. The Tribunal&#039;s classification was upheld and the challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 16:32:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82881" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (10) TMI 85 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44352</link>
      <description>Paper printed with colour by the rotogravure process using a PVC compound was treated as covered by the exemption entry in Notification No. 68 of 1976. The SC accepted that rotogravure colour printing is a recognised form of printing and held that paper subjected to such printing fell within the notification covering converted types of paper obtained by one side being printed with colour, with or without design, and whether or not later varnished, glazed or embossed. The Tribunal&#039;s classification was upheld and the challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44352</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>