https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772744 The Appellate Tribunal under SAFEMA dismissed the appeal challenging property attachment under PMLA, 2002. The appellant challenged attachment of property purchased in her name, arguing she was not charged with predicate offences, the property was purchased with her daughter's financial assistance, and it was acquired after the alleged offence period (2004-2008). The Tribunal held that properties can be attached regardless of whether the possessor is charged with predicate offences, rejected the claim of legitimate funding from the daughter due to insufficient evidence, and ruled that property purchased after the offence period can still be attached as money laundering is a continuing offence. en-us Mon, 26 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Jun 2025 08:41:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772744 The Appellate Tribunal under SAFEMA dismissed the appeal challenging property attachment under PMLA, 2002. The appellant challenged attachment of property purchased in her name, arguing she was not charged with predicate offences, the property was purchased with her daughter's financial assistance, and it was acquired after the alleged offence period (2004-2008). The Tribunal held that properties can be attached regardless of whether the possessor is charged with predicate offences, rejected the claim of legitimate funding from the daughter due to insufficient evidence, and ruled that property purchased after the offence period can still be attached as money laundering is a continuing offence. Case-Laws Money Laundering Mon, 26 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772744