https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772746 For an application under Section 95 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963 supplies the relevant three-year limitation period, and any period directed to be excluded by the Supreme Court in its suo motu limitation orders must be deducted when computing time. Applying that exclusion, the application was found to have been filed within time because the invocation date fell within the excluded period. The limitation-based rejection was therefore set aside, and the matter was restored for fresh consideration. en-us Tue, 04 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Jun 2025 08:41:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772746 For an application under Section 95 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963 supplies the relevant three-year limitation period, and any period directed to be excluded by the Supreme Court in its suo motu limitation orders must be deducted when computing time. Applying that exclusion, the application was found to have been filed within time because the invocation date fell within the excluded period. The limitation-based rejection was therefore set aside, and the matter was restored for fresh consideration. Case-Laws IBC Tue, 04 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772746