https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772747 AT dismissed contempt application against Respondents for alleged violation of stay order. No prima facie evidence established willful disobedience of interim order. Court found Respondents' actions did not directly breach stay, and allegations lacked specific material proof. Tribunal emphasized contempt proceedings require clear evidence of intentional violation, which was absent in this case. Application dismissed for lack of merit. en-us Mon, 28 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Jun 2025 08:41:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772747 AT dismissed contempt application against Respondents for alleged violation of stay order. No prima facie evidence established willful disobedience of interim order. Court found Respondents' actions did not directly breach stay, and allegations lacked specific material proof. Tribunal emphasized contempt proceedings require clear evidence of intentional violation, which was absent in this case. Application dismissed for lack of merit. Case-Laws IBC Mon, 28 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772747