<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 870 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772757</link>
    <description>Bombay HC dismissed petitions challenging maintainability and proper officer authority for issuing show cause notices. Following SC decision in Canon India Pvt. Ltd., court held DRI officers are proper officers for issuing notices and upheld Validation Act empowering them. Despite petitioners&#039; arguments for extraordinary jurisdiction due to additional grounds beyond Canon India precedent, HC refused to bypass statutory alternative remedies. Court noted all contentions could be raised before Appellate Authority and pre-deposit requirement doesn&#039;t render statutory remedy inefficacious. Petitions disposed as alternative appellate remedy available.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2025 08:41:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=828793" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 870 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772757</link>
      <description>Bombay HC dismissed petitions challenging maintainability and proper officer authority for issuing show cause notices. Following SC decision in Canon India Pvt. Ltd., court held DRI officers are proper officers for issuing notices and upheld Validation Act empowering them. Despite petitioners&#039; arguments for extraordinary jurisdiction due to additional grounds beyond Canon India precedent, HC refused to bypass statutory alternative remedies. Court noted all contentions could be raised before Appellate Authority and pre-deposit requirement doesn&#039;t render statutory remedy inefficacious. Petitions disposed as alternative appellate remedy available.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772757</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>