<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 873 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772760</link>
    <description>ITAT Rajkot set aside PCIT&#039;s revision order under section 263 for violating principles of natural justice. The tribunal found PCIT failed to examine documents submitted by assessee during revisionary proceedings and did not provide specific findings on their relevance or identify patent errors. Matter remanded to PCIT with directions to examine assessee&#039;s documents, provide findings, and grant reasonable opportunity of hearing. Appeal allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2025 08:41:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=828790" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 873 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772760</link>
      <description>ITAT Rajkot set aside PCIT&#039;s revision order under section 263 for violating principles of natural justice. The tribunal found PCIT failed to examine documents submitted by assessee during revisionary proceedings and did not provide specific findings on their relevance or identify patent errors. Matter remanded to PCIT with directions to examine assessee&#039;s documents, provide findings, and grant reasonable opportunity of hearing. Appeal allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772760</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>