<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 877 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772764</link>
    <description>ITAT Bangalore held that denial of Foreign Tax Credit (FTC) based solely on late submission of Form 67 violates DTAA provisions. The Tribunal ruled that Rule 128(9) does not mandate disallowance of FTC for delayed filing, Form 67 filing is directory rather than mandatory, and DTAA overrides domestic rules. Following precedent in Ms. Brinda Ramakrishna case, the assessee was granted FTC entitlement with directions to AO for verification and allowance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2025 08:41:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=828786" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 877 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772764</link>
      <description>ITAT Bangalore held that denial of Foreign Tax Credit (FTC) based solely on late submission of Form 67 violates DTAA provisions. The Tribunal ruled that Rule 128(9) does not mandate disallowance of FTC for delayed filing, Form 67 filing is directory rather than mandatory, and DTAA overrides domestic rules. Following precedent in Ms. Brinda Ramakrishna case, the assessee was granted FTC entitlement with directions to AO for verification and allowance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772764</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>