<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 885 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772772</link>
    <description>ITAT ruled that a section 143(2) income tax notice lacking specification of scrutiny type and non-conforming to CBDT Instruction is invalid. The tribunal quashed the subsequent assessment order, finding the Assessing Officer&#039;s jurisdiction vitiated. The court admitted the additional legal ground at the appellate stage, emphasizing procedural compliance and fundamental legal principles in tax assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2025 08:41:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=828778" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 885 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772772</link>
      <description>ITAT ruled that a section 143(2) income tax notice lacking specification of scrutiny type and non-conforming to CBDT Instruction is invalid. The tribunal quashed the subsequent assessment order, finding the Assessing Officer&#039;s jurisdiction vitiated. The court admitted the additional legal ground at the appellate stage, emphasizing procedural compliance and fundamental legal principles in tax assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772772</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>