<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 905 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772792</link>
    <description>HC found a violation of natural justice in tax assessment proceedings. The assessment order was set aside due to denial of adequate opportunity to respond and lack of personal hearing. The Court remanded the matter, directing the respondent to provide the petitioner a fair chance to present their case, including a 14-day notice for personal hearing and three weeks to file a reply.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2025 08:41:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=828758" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 905 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772792</link>
      <description>HC found a violation of natural justice in tax assessment proceedings. The assessment order was set aside due to denial of adequate opportunity to respond and lack of personal hearing. The Court remanded the matter, directing the respondent to provide the petitioner a fair chance to present their case, including a 14-day notice for personal hearing and three weeks to file a reply.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772792</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>