<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 906 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772793</link>
    <description>The SC addressed the validity of ex-parte income tax assessment orders served solely through an e-portal. The Court ruled that digital service is insufficient for individuals with limited digital access, emphasizing principles of natural justice. The assessment orders were set aside, and the petitioner was granted six weeks to file a reply and receive a personal hearing, ensuring fair procedural treatment for economically disadvantaged taxpayers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2025 08:41:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=828757" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 906 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772793</link>
      <description>The SC addressed the validity of ex-parte income tax assessment orders served solely through an e-portal. The Court ruled that digital service is insufficient for individuals with limited digital access, emphasizing principles of natural justice. The assessment orders were set aside, and the petitioner was granted six weeks to file a reply and receive a personal hearing, ensuring fair procedural treatment for economically disadvantaged taxpayers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772793</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>