<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 907 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772794</link>
    <description>The Bombay HC held that reassessment proceedings were invalid due to non-disposal of assessee&#039;s objections before passing the assessment order under Section 147 r/w 144B of the IT Act. The court found breach of natural justice principles, rejecting the revenue&#039;s contention that no formal objections were filed. The assessee had clearly objected to alleged bogus transactions and stated no acquaintance with the concerned person. Despite objections filed in July 2021 and compliance with notice requirements by March 2022, the assessing officer incorrectly claimed time-bar issues. The HC remanded the matter for proper disposal of objections first, following GKN Driveshafts precedent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2025 08:41:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=828756" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 907 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772794</link>
      <description>The Bombay HC held that reassessment proceedings were invalid due to non-disposal of assessee&#039;s objections before passing the assessment order under Section 147 r/w 144B of the IT Act. The court found breach of natural justice principles, rejecting the revenue&#039;s contention that no formal objections were filed. The assessee had clearly objected to alleged bogus transactions and stated no acquaintance with the concerned person. Despite objections filed in July 2021 and compliance with notice requirements by March 2022, the assessing officer incorrectly claimed time-bar issues. The HC remanded the matter for proper disposal of objections first, following GKN Driveshafts precedent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772794</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>