<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 917 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772804</link>
    <description>Input tax credit on GST paid for construction of the tie-in pipeline used to carry re-gasified LNG from the FSRU to the National Grid is not admissible under section 17(5)(c) and section 17(5)(d) of the CGST Act. The Authority treated the FSRU as factory premises because regasification activity occurs there, but held that the proposed pipeline is a pipeline laid outside the factory premises and therefore falls within the statutory exclusion. It further held that attached equipment and control systems do not alter the pipeline&#039;s essential character for GST purposes, and that the cited case law cannot override the specific statutory definition under the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2025 08:41:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=828746" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 917 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772804</link>
      <description>Input tax credit on GST paid for construction of the tie-in pipeline used to carry re-gasified LNG from the FSRU to the National Grid is not admissible under section 17(5)(c) and section 17(5)(d) of the CGST Act. The Authority treated the FSRU as factory premises because regasification activity occurs there, but held that the proposed pipeline is a pipeline laid outside the factory premises and therefore falls within the statutory exclusion. It further held that attached equipment and control systems do not alter the pipeline&#039;s essential character for GST purposes, and that the cited case law cannot override the specific statutory definition under the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772804</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>