<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 920 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772807</link>
    <description>The Allahabad HC allowed a petition challenging GST registration cancellation under Rule 21(a) of CGST/SGST Rules. The court found that while the show cause notice cited failure to file returns for six months, the cancellation order was based on a different ground - no business at declared place - without providing notice to the petitioner. The HC held this violated principles of natural justice and Article 14 of the Constitution. The quasi-judicial order affecting the petitioner&#039;s Article 19 business rights was passed without application of mind. The matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority with directions to issue fresh notice within one week specifying cancellation reasons.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2025 08:41:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=828743" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 920 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772807</link>
      <description>The Allahabad HC allowed a petition challenging GST registration cancellation under Rule 21(a) of CGST/SGST Rules. The court found that while the show cause notice cited failure to file returns for six months, the cancellation order was based on a different ground - no business at declared place - without providing notice to the petitioner. The HC held this violated principles of natural justice and Article 14 of the Constitution. The quasi-judicial order affecting the petitioner&#039;s Article 19 business rights was passed without application of mind. The matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority with directions to issue fresh notice within one week specifying cancellation reasons.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772807</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>