<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 923 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772810</link>
    <description>HC analyzed the validity of GST notice service through common portal, finding sole electronic communication insufficient. The court set aside an ex parte assessment order, directing tax authorities to serve notices via registered post and provide a fair hearing. The petitioner was required to deposit 10% of disputed tax and receive a fresh opportunity to present their case, balancing procedural fairness with revenue collection interests.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2025 08:41:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=828740" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 923 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772810</link>
      <description>HC analyzed the validity of GST notice service through common portal, finding sole electronic communication insufficient. The court set aside an ex parte assessment order, directing tax authorities to serve notices via registered post and provide a fair hearing. The petitioner was required to deposit 10% of disputed tax and receive a fresh opportunity to present their case, balancing procedural fairness with revenue collection interests.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772810</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>