<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (10) TMI 78 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44345</link>
    <description>A party cannot change in appeal the factual and legal basis on which it chose to contest an excise duty demand before the Tribunal. Here, the appellants had defended the show cause notice and Tribunal proceedings on the footing that clause (iv) of the exemption notification applied, but later sought to rely on clause (i) and the wording of the notice before the SC. That shift was rejected, and the appellants were not permitted to resile from their earlier stand. The challenge to the central excise duty demand therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 16:03:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82874" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (10) TMI 78 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44345</link>
      <description>A party cannot change in appeal the factual and legal basis on which it chose to contest an excise duty demand before the Tribunal. Here, the appellants had defended the show cause notice and Tribunal proceedings on the footing that clause (iv) of the exemption notification applied, but later sought to rely on clause (i) and the wording of the notice before the SC. That shift was rejected, and the appellants were not permitted to resile from their earlier stand. The challenge to the central excise duty demand therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44345</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>