<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 1463 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462349</link>
    <description>Service tax on directors&#039; remuneration under the reverse charge mechanism under Sl. No. 5A of Notification No. 30/2012-ST was treated as settled against the Revenue. The coordinate decisions relied on had already held that such tax was not recoverable from the assessee in the manner urged by the Revenue, and that view was followed. The appeals were allowed and the departmental demand was held not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2025 20:22:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=828710" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 1463 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462349</link>
      <description>Service tax on directors&#039; remuneration under the reverse charge mechanism under Sl. No. 5A of Notification No. 30/2012-ST was treated as settled against the Revenue. The coordinate decisions relied on had already held that such tax was not recoverable from the assessee in the manner urged by the Revenue, and that view was followed. The appeals were allowed and the departmental demand was held not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462349</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>