<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (9) TMI 133 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44342</link>
    <description>Alkali Blue Flushing used in printing ink was held not classifiable as synthetic organic dyestuff under Item 14D because no evidence showed use in any dyeing process, even though the product could also be used as a paint and to tone or tint ink. The Tribunal&#039;s view that Item 14D did not apply was therefore justified, and the commodity fell under Item 14-I(1)(ii). Where two tariff classifications were reasonably possible, the construction favourable to the assessee had to be adopted. The Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2015 17:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82871" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (9) TMI 133 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44342</link>
      <description>Alkali Blue Flushing used in printing ink was held not classifiable as synthetic organic dyestuff under Item 14D because no evidence showed use in any dyeing process, even though the product could also be used as a paint and to tone or tint ink. The Tribunal&#039;s view that Item 14D did not apply was therefore justified, and the commodity fell under Item 14-I(1)(ii). Where two tariff classifications were reasonably possible, the construction favourable to the assessee had to be adopted. The Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44342</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>