https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44339 The High Court upheld the Single Judge's decision to dismiss the writ petition, emphasizing the need to exhaust statutory remedies before seeking relief under Article 226. The Court rejected the argument that the appeal remedy was onerous, citing the legislature's right to impose conditions on appeals. The judgment highlights the discretionary nature of Article 226 remedies and the importance of following statutory procedures for appeals against administrative orders. en-us Wed, 19 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 25 Jun 2010 15:34:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44339 The High Court upheld the Single Judge's decision to dismiss the writ petition, emphasizing the need to exhaust statutory remedies before seeking relief under Article 226. The Court rejected the argument that the appeal remedy was onerous, citing the legislature's right to impose conditions on appeals. The judgment highlights the discretionary nature of Article 226 remedies and the importance of following statutory procedures for appeals against administrative orders. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 19 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44339