<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (3) TMI 137 - HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44336</link>
    <description>Fiscal exemption conditions attached to a transferable value-based advance licence must be strictly fulfilled. The document states that where export obligation was linked to a no-Modvat-credit requirement, later reversal of credit did not cure the original breach, and duty-free clearance remained unavailable. It also notes that customs authorities may deny exemption and insist on duty payment when the prescribed conditions are not satisfied. Any dispute between the transferor and transferees over ultimate duty liability is distinct from the customs exemption question and was not treated as affecting the denial of benefit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 15:28:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82865" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (3) TMI 137 - HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44336</link>
      <description>Fiscal exemption conditions attached to a transferable value-based advance licence must be strictly fulfilled. The document states that where export obligation was linked to a no-Modvat-credit requirement, later reversal of credit did not cure the original breach, and duty-free clearance remained unavailable. It also notes that customs authorities may deny exemption and insist on duty payment when the prescribed conditions are not satisfied. Any dispute between the transferor and transferees over ultimate duty liability is distinct from the customs exemption question and was not treated as affecting the denial of benefit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44336</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>