<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (6) TMI 88 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44334</link>
    <description>The court directed the Commissioner of Customs to release the goods upon payment of customs duty and furnishing of a bond, in compliance with a Supreme Court order due to the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s non-compliance with the Tribunal&#039;s directive. The writ petitioner was entitled to release the goods without furnishing a bank guarantee. The court ordered completion of proceedings within three weeks, emphasizing that the decision was based on records and not an admission of the allegations by the respondents. No strictures were imposed on the Adjudicating Authority despite concerns raised by the petitioner&#039;s counsel.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 15:25:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82863" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (6) TMI 88 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44334</link>
      <description>The court directed the Commissioner of Customs to release the goods upon payment of customs duty and furnishing of a bond, in compliance with a Supreme Court order due to the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s non-compliance with the Tribunal&#039;s directive. The writ petitioner was entitled to release the goods without furnishing a bank guarantee. The court ordered completion of proceedings within three weeks, emphasizing that the decision was based on records and not an admission of the allegations by the respondents. No strictures were imposed on the Adjudicating Authority despite concerns raised by the petitioner&#039;s counsel.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44334</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>