https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89343 HC determined that the Permanent Establishment (PE) status remained unresolved between jurisdictional tax authorities despite mutual agreement attempts. The MAP determination in 2017 was not properly communicated to the Tribunal, which continued proceedings for Assessment Years 2006-07 and 2008-09 based on incomplete information. The court set aside the existing orders, mandating the Tribunal to comprehensively re-examine the PE issue and tax implications, ensuring a fresh and thorough adjudication of the unresolved taxation matters. en-us Thu, 12 Jun 2025 07:21:34 +0530 Thu, 12 Jun 2025 07:21:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89343 HC determined that the Permanent Establishment (PE) status remained unresolved between jurisdictional tax authorities despite mutual agreement attempts. The MAP determination in 2017 was not properly communicated to the Tribunal, which continued proceedings for Assessment Years 2006-07 and 2008-09 based on incomplete information. The court set aside the existing orders, mandating the Tribunal to comprehensively re-examine the PE issue and tax implications, ensuring a fresh and thorough adjudication of the unresolved taxation matters. Highlights Income Tax Thu, 12 Jun 2025 07:21:34 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89343