<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 764 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772651</link>
    <description>CESTAT Kolkata allowed the appeal of an incorporated public limited company challenging service tax demands totaling Rs. 63,95,366 for restaurant services, rental services to a third party operator, and advertising services for 2008-2013. The tribunal held that restaurant services provided exclusively to club members fall under mutuality principle and are not liable for service tax, following SC precedent in Calcutta Club Limited. The arrangement with third party restaurant operator was deemed not a lease but a revenue-sharing agreement, exempting it from rental service tax. Advertising services within club premises were also held non-taxable. The tribunal found no suppression of facts as the company maintained proper records and held bonafide belief based on favorable HC decisions. All major demands were set aside except uncontested rental charges to other parties, with refund claims rejected for limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2025 10:04:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=828531" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 764 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772651</link>
      <description>CESTAT Kolkata allowed the appeal of an incorporated public limited company challenging service tax demands totaling Rs. 63,95,366 for restaurant services, rental services to a third party operator, and advertising services for 2008-2013. The tribunal held that restaurant services provided exclusively to club members fall under mutuality principle and are not liable for service tax, following SC precedent in Calcutta Club Limited. The arrangement with third party restaurant operator was deemed not a lease but a revenue-sharing agreement, exempting it from rental service tax. Advertising services within club premises were also held non-taxable. The tribunal found no suppression of facts as the company maintained proper records and held bonafide belief based on favorable HC decisions. All major demands were set aside except uncontested rental charges to other parties, with refund claims rejected for limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772651</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>