https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772660 Clear and unequivocal admissions that a sum is a refundable security deposit can support a decree on admission under Order XII Rule 6, including where later pleadings and affidavits reinforce the same position. The text also notes that a corporate insolvency resolution process and approved resolution plan may extinguish the asserted basis for retaining the deposit under the clean slate principle, and that acknowledgments in emails can extend limitation under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963. On that analysis, objections based on conditionality, limitation, forfeiture, and related arbitration contentions were rejected. en-us Mon, 09 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 12 Jun 2025 07:21:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772660 Clear and unequivocal admissions that a sum is a refundable security deposit can support a decree on admission under Order XII Rule 6, including where later pleadings and affidavits reinforce the same position. The text also notes that a corporate insolvency resolution process and approved resolution plan may extinguish the asserted basis for retaining the deposit under the clean slate principle, and that acknowledgments in emails can extend limitation under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963. On that analysis, objections based on conditionality, limitation, forfeiture, and related arbitration contentions were rejected. Case-Laws IBC Mon, 09 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772660