<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 775 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772662</link>
    <description>AT upheld appellant&#039;s challenge against customs value enhancement. The tribunal found procedural irregularities in applying valuation rules, specifically non-compliance with rule 12 of Customs Valuation Rules, 2007. The order enhancing customs value and imposing penalties was set aside due to insufficient evidence and improper sequential application of valuation methodology. Appeal was allowed, restoring original declared value.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2025 07:21:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=828520" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 775 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772662</link>
      <description>AT upheld appellant&#039;s challenge against customs value enhancement. The tribunal found procedural irregularities in applying valuation rules, specifically non-compliance with rule 12 of Customs Valuation Rules, 2007. The order enhancing customs value and imposing penalties was set aside due to insufficient evidence and improper sequential application of valuation methodology. Appeal was allowed, restoring original declared value.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772662</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>