https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772666 CESTAT Ahmedabad allowed the appeal against revocation of authorised carrier registration under SCMTR 2018. The appellant was charged with violating Regulation 10(1)(l) and 10(1)(m) for allegedly not complying with waiver letter regarding rent/demurrage charges during SIIB detention period. CESTAT found the appellant acted per SCMTR 2018 regulations and did not violate the provisions. The tribunal held that SIIB's direction not to charge rent/demurrage till customs clearance was improper given additional delays beyond detention period. Both revocation of registration and penalty were set aside as unjustified. en-us Tue, 10 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 12 Jun 2025 07:21:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772666 CESTAT Ahmedabad allowed the appeal against revocation of authorised carrier registration under SCMTR 2018. The appellant was charged with violating Regulation 10(1)(l) and 10(1)(m) for allegedly not complying with waiver letter regarding rent/demurrage charges during SIIB detention period. CESTAT found the appellant acted per SCMTR 2018 regulations and did not violate the provisions. The tribunal held that SIIB's direction not to charge rent/demurrage till customs clearance was improper given additional delays beyond detention period. Both revocation of registration and penalty were set aside as unjustified. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 10 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772666