<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 785 - ITAT DEHRADUN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772672</link>
    <description>ITAT ruled in favor of assessee regarding cash deposits during demonetization period. The assessee had substantial declared income and provided complete details of cash withdrawals from bank with specific purposes. Revenue failed to prove cash withdrawals were used for other purposes. ITAT held assessee had sufficient cash balance to explain deposits, finding them properly explained. No addition warranted under Section 69A read with Section 115BBE. Assessee&#039;s grounds allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2025 18:17:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=828510" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 785 - ITAT DEHRADUN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772672</link>
      <description>ITAT ruled in favor of assessee regarding cash deposits during demonetization period. The assessee had substantial declared income and provided complete details of cash withdrawals from bank with specific purposes. Revenue failed to prove cash withdrawals were used for other purposes. ITAT held assessee had sufficient cash balance to explain deposits, finding them properly explained. No addition warranted under Section 69A read with Section 115BBE. Assessee&#039;s grounds allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772672</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>