<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 795 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772682</link>
    <description>An ex parte ITAT appellate order passed without addressing a valid adjournment request and without giving effective opportunity of hearing can constitute a mistake apparent from the record under section 254(2). On that basis, the Tribunal recalled the order, allowed the miscellaneous application, and restored the matter for fresh adjudication on merits after due opportunity to the assessee, so that no prejudice is caused to the parties&#039; rights.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2025 07:21:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=828500" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 795 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772682</link>
      <description>An ex parte ITAT appellate order passed without addressing a valid adjournment request and without giving effective opportunity of hearing can constitute a mistake apparent from the record under section 254(2). On that basis, the Tribunal recalled the order, allowed the miscellaneous application, and restored the matter for fresh adjudication on merits after due opportunity to the assessee, so that no prejudice is caused to the parties&#039; rights.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772682</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>