<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (4) TMI 123 - HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44320</link>
    <description>The writ petition was disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to pursue their case before the competent authority, which was directed to decide the matter in accordance with law. The High Court did not examine the merits of the challenge to the circular or the show cause notice, and no substantive adjudication was made on the dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 14:12:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82849" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (4) TMI 123 - HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44320</link>
      <description>The writ petition was disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to pursue their case before the competent authority, which was directed to decide the matter in accordance with law. The High Court did not examine the merits of the challenge to the circular or the show cause notice, and no substantive adjudication was made on the dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44320</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>