<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 808 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772695</link>
    <description>The SC examined the taxability of Rs. 28,69,580 received from a non-resident as loan repayment. The court held that receipts from outside India, when adequately explained as loan repayments and without other Indian income sources, cannot be treated as unexplained income under sections 69A and 115BBE. The appeal was allowed, with the addition deleted, emphasizing that absence of bank statements does not automatically render foreign remittances taxable in India.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2025 17:09:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=828487" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 808 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772695</link>
      <description>The SC examined the taxability of Rs. 28,69,580 received from a non-resident as loan repayment. The court held that receipts from outside India, when adequately explained as loan repayments and without other Indian income sources, cannot be treated as unexplained income under sections 69A and 115BBE. The appeal was allowed, with the addition deleted, emphasizing that absence of bank statements does not automatically render foreign remittances taxable in India.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772695</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>