<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 817 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772704</link>
    <description>The ITAT Ahmedabad allowed appeals against CIT(Exemption)&#039;s rejection of applications for registration u/s 12A(1)(ac)(iii) and approval u/s 80G(5)(iii). The rejection was based solely on procedural grounds - failure to respond to statutory notices. The assessee provided credible explanation citing rural location and lack of digital infrastructure access. The delay was neither deliberate nor contumacious. Appeals were filed promptly upon discovery of adverse orders, demonstrating bona fide conduct. Required documents were already on record from prior proceedings. Considering substantial justice, the assessee deserved effective hearing opportunity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2025 07:21:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=828478" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 817 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772704</link>
      <description>The ITAT Ahmedabad allowed appeals against CIT(Exemption)&#039;s rejection of applications for registration u/s 12A(1)(ac)(iii) and approval u/s 80G(5)(iii). The rejection was based solely on procedural grounds - failure to respond to statutory notices. The assessee provided credible explanation citing rural location and lack of digital infrastructure access. The delay was neither deliberate nor contumacious. Appeals were filed promptly upon discovery of adverse orders, demonstrating bona fide conduct. Required documents were already on record from prior proceedings. Considering substantial justice, the assessee deserved effective hearing opportunity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772704</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>