<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 822 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772709</link>
    <description>ITAT Mumbai ruled in favor of the assessee regarding addition under section 68 for alleged bogus capital gains and denial of exemption under section 10(38). The tribunal held that share purchase and sale transactions cannot be considered bogus when documentary evidence establishes genuineness of the claim. The AO was directed to delete the addition made under section 68. The assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2025 07:21:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=828473" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 822 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772709</link>
      <description>ITAT Mumbai ruled in favor of the assessee regarding addition under section 68 for alleged bogus capital gains and denial of exemption under section 10(38). The tribunal held that share purchase and sale transactions cannot be considered bogus when documentary evidence establishes genuineness of the claim. The AO was directed to delete the addition made under section 68. The assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772709</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>