https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44317 The appeal against the judgment of the Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court was dismissed by the Supreme Court. The appellant, involved in importing goods for Nepal, sought compensation for alleged loss and damage due to the detention of goods by customs authorities at Calcutta Port. However, the Supreme Court held that since the Single Judge's order only directed the release of goods without mentioning compensation, and the appellant did not appeal this decision, the claim for compensation was not valid. Without proof of damage or loss to the goods, the appeal was dismissed. A similar decision was reached in a separate appeal involving another party. en-us Mon, 16 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 25 Jun 2010 13:58:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44317 The appeal against the judgment of the Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court was dismissed by the Supreme Court. The appellant, involved in importing goods for Nepal, sought compensation for alleged loss and damage due to the detention of goods by customs authorities at Calcutta Port. However, the Supreme Court held that since the Single Judge's order only directed the release of goods without mentioning compensation, and the appellant did not appeal this decision, the claim for compensation was not valid. Without proof of damage or loss to the goods, the appeal was dismissed. A similar decision was reached in a separate appeal involving another party. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 16 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44317