<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 1571 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462336</link>
    <description>The HC examined a tax assessment case involving a nine-year delay in finalizing a provisional assessment. The court preliminarily held that the extensive delay was unreasonable and unjustifiable. The writ petition was deemed maintainable despite alternative statutory remedies. The HC directed the respondent to file a counter within three weeks and indicated that the impugned order could be challenged on grounds of procedural unreasonableness and lack of due consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2025 20:03:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=828429" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 1571 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462336</link>
      <description>The HC examined a tax assessment case involving a nine-year delay in finalizing a provisional assessment. The court preliminarily held that the extensive delay was unreasonable and unjustifiable. The writ petition was deemed maintainable despite alternative statutory remedies. The HC directed the respondent to file a counter within three weeks and indicated that the impugned order could be challenged on grounds of procedural unreasonableness and lack of due consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462336</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>