<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 1575 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462337</link>
    <description>An omitted sub-ground challenging disallowance under section 14A, including the claim that no exempt income was earned and that the assessee had made its own disallowance, was not dealt with in the earlier appellate order. That omission was treated as a mistake apparent from the record. The Tribunal therefore recalled the order only to the limited extent necessary to adjudicate the neglected section 14A sub-ground, and the rectification application was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2025 20:03:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=828428" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 1575 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462337</link>
      <description>An omitted sub-ground challenging disallowance under section 14A, including the claim that no exempt income was earned and that the assessee had made its own disallowance, was not dealt with in the earlier appellate order. That omission was treated as a mistake apparent from the record. The Tribunal therefore recalled the order only to the limited extent necessary to adjudicate the neglected section 14A sub-ground, and the rectification application was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=462337</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>