<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (8) TMI 109 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44311</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, ruling that the goods were improperly removed from the bonded warehouse upon the expiry of the permitted period. The applicable rate of duty was determined to be the rate in force on that date. The demand notice issued by the Customs authorities was deemed legal and enforceable, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal with costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2015 17:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82840" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (8) TMI 109 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44311</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, ruling that the goods were improperly removed from the bonded warehouse upon the expiry of the permitted period. The applicable rate of duty was determined to be the rate in force on that date. The demand notice issued by the Customs authorities was deemed legal and enforceable, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal with costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44311</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>