<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (9) TMI 72 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44306</link>
    <description>The court dismissed all writ petitions challenging the jurisdiction and authority of Central Excise authorities to search and seize &#039;Pan Masala&#039; products. It held that &#039;Pan Masala&#039; was considered &#039;manufactured&#039; under the Central Excises and Salt Act before 1985, not eligible for exemptions, and classifiable under Tariff Item 68. The court concluded that the search and seizure operations were valid, and the petitions lacked merit, thus dismissing them with costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 13:28:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=82835" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (9) TMI 72 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44306</link>
      <description>The court dismissed all writ petitions challenging the jurisdiction and authority of Central Excise authorities to search and seize &#039;Pan Masala&#039; products. It held that &#039;Pan Masala&#039; was considered &#039;manufactured&#039; under the Central Excises and Salt Act before 1985, not eligible for exemptions, and classifiable under Tariff Item 68. The court concluded that the search and seizure operations were valid, and the petitions lacked merit, thus dismissing them with costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=44306</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>