https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89298 ITAT remanded the case back to CIT(A) regarding income from other sources calculation. The tribunal identified an unresolved discrepancy between the assessee's claimed 5.28% and the proposed 15% addition of capital grants and subsidies. The CIT(A) was directed to re-examine the income classification, provide a detailed analysis of the income source, and ensure the assessee receives a fair hearing in accordance with principles of natural justice. The matter requires further adjudication to determine the precise tax treatment of the contested income sources. en-us Wed, 11 Jun 2025 08:36:45 +0530 Wed, 11 Jun 2025 08:36:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89298 ITAT remanded the case back to CIT(A) regarding income from other sources calculation. The tribunal identified an unresolved discrepancy between the assessee's claimed 5.28% and the proposed 15% addition of capital grants and subsidies. The CIT(A) was directed to re-examine the income classification, provide a detailed analysis of the income source, and ensure the assessee receives a fair hearing in accordance with principles of natural justice. The matter requires further adjudication to determine the precise tax treatment of the contested income sources. Highlights Income Tax Wed, 11 Jun 2025 08:36:45 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=89298