https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772562 Rejection of a plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC is confined to the plaint averments and is permissible only when no cause of action is disclosed, the suit is barred by law, or another limited ground is made out on the face of the plaint. Here, the pleadings raised a distinct challenge to sale deeds executed after alleged revocation of authority, and the court held that this could not be shut out at the threshold. Unregistered documents did not by themselves convey title or create an interest in immovable property, and questions on revocation, validity of the sale deeds, mutation entries, and title required trial. Insufficient court fee also could not justify outright rejection without an opportunity to cure the defect. The plaint therefore had to be tried on merits. en-us Fri, 23 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Jun 2025 08:36:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772562 Rejection of a plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC is confined to the plaint averments and is permissible only when no cause of action is disclosed, the suit is barred by law, or another limited ground is made out on the face of the plaint. Here, the pleadings raised a distinct challenge to sale deeds executed after alleged revocation of authority, and the court held that this could not be shut out at the threshold. Unregistered documents did not by themselves convey title or create an interest in immovable property, and questions on revocation, validity of the sale deeds, mutation entries, and title required trial. Insufficient court fee also could not justify outright rejection without an opportunity to cure the defect. The plaint therefore had to be tried on merits. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 23 May 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772562