<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 695 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772582</link>
    <description>Under the Target Plus Scheme, import of freely importable inputs for the importer&#039;s own use was permissible where a broad commercial nexus existed with the relevant product group, and physical incorporation into the exported product was not mandatory. Applying that interpretation, the imported PP/PE granules used in the assessee&#039;s manufacturing activity were held to qualify for the scheme, especially as the original authority had accepted the explanation and the Revenue produced no material to dislodge that finding. As the substantive benefit was correctly extended, penalty proceedings that depended entirely on the alleged main violation could not be sustained and were dropped.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2025 17:01:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=828254" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 695 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772582</link>
      <description>Under the Target Plus Scheme, import of freely importable inputs for the importer&#039;s own use was permissible where a broad commercial nexus existed with the relevant product group, and physical incorporation into the exported product was not mandatory. Applying that interpretation, the imported PP/PE granules used in the assessee&#039;s manufacturing activity were held to qualify for the scheme, especially as the original authority had accepted the explanation and the Revenue produced no material to dislodge that finding. As the substantive benefit was correctly extended, penalty proceedings that depended entirely on the alleged main violation could not be sustained and were dropped.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772582</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>