<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 698 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772585</link>
    <description>ITAT Kolkata dismissed revenue&#039;s appeal regarding addition of undisclosed revenue from project Altius. The assessee&#039;s project completion method of revenue recognition was accepted in prior assessment year 2017-18, establishing consistency principle per Radhasoami Satsang SC precedent. AO erroneously computed addition under percentage completion method by including co-owners&#039; 51.56% share instead of assessee&#039;s 48.44% share, resulting in excess calculation. Project ultimately resulted in loss of Rs.18,71,78,668 in AY 2021-22. CIT(A) correctly applied ICDS-III and AS-7 for revenue recognition. Addition regarding interest expenses to land co-owners also deleted as advances were given against amounts payable, not requiring interest charges.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2025 08:36:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=828251" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 698 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772585</link>
      <description>ITAT Kolkata dismissed revenue&#039;s appeal regarding addition of undisclosed revenue from project Altius. The assessee&#039;s project completion method of revenue recognition was accepted in prior assessment year 2017-18, establishing consistency principle per Radhasoami Satsang SC precedent. AO erroneously computed addition under percentage completion method by including co-owners&#039; 51.56% share instead of assessee&#039;s 48.44% share, resulting in excess calculation. Project ultimately resulted in loss of Rs.18,71,78,668 in AY 2021-22. CIT(A) correctly applied ICDS-III and AS-7 for revenue recognition. Addition regarding interest expenses to land co-owners also deleted as advances were given against amounts payable, not requiring interest charges.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772585</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>