<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (6) TMI 703 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772590</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal remanded the case back to the CIT(E) for fresh consideration. The key findings were: (1) the trust&#039;s charitable objects were not comprehensively evaluated, (2) the assessee was not provided adequate opportunity to be heard, and (3) the Section 80G(5) approval is contingent on Section 12A registration. The tribunal instructed a holistic review of the trust&#039;s objectives with procedural fairness.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2025 15:51:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=828246" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (6) TMI 703 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772590</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal remanded the case back to the CIT(E) for fresh consideration. The key findings were: (1) the trust&#039;s charitable objects were not comprehensively evaluated, (2) the assessee was not provided adequate opportunity to be heard, and (3) the Section 80G(5) approval is contingent on Section 12A registration. The tribunal instructed a holistic review of the trust&#039;s objectives with procedural fairness.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=772590</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>